剑桥雅思阅读原文翻译及答案分析：having a laugh

剑桥雅思阅读原文翻译及答案分析：having a laugh

第1段

Humans start developing a sense of humour as early as six weeks old, when babies begin to laugh and smile in response to stimuli. Laughter is universal across all human cultures and even exists in some form in rats, chimps, and bonobos. Like other human emotions and expressions, laughter and humour provide psychological scientists with rich resources for studying human psychology, ranging from the development of language to the neuroscience of social perception.

人类在6周大的时候就开始出现幽默感。这个时候，婴儿会开始使用大笑和微笑来回应外界刺激。笑是所有人类文化所共有的，它甚至以某种形式存在于老鼠、黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩中。正如人类其他情绪和表情一样，笑和幽默为心理学家提供了研究人类心理的丰富资源，从语言的发展到社会认知的神经科学等等。

第2段

Theories focusing on the evolution of laughter point to it as an important adaptation for social communication. Take, for example, the recorded laughter in TV comedy shows. Back in 1950, US sound engineer Charley Douglass hated dealing with the unpredictable laughter of live audiences, so started recording his own ‘laugh tracks’. These were intended to help people at home feel like they were in a social situation, such as a crowded theatre. Douglass even recorded various types of laughter, as well as mixtures of laughter from men, women, and children. In doing so, he picked up on a quality of laughter that is now interesting researchers: a simple ‘haha’ communicates a remarkable amount of socially relevant information.

关注笑容进化的理论指出，它是对社会交流的重要适应。以电视喜剧中事先录好的笑声为例。1950年，美国声音工程师Charley Douglass厌倦了处理现场观众无法预测的笑声，因此开始录制他自己的“笑声轨道”。这些音轨原本是为了让那些待在家里的人感觉自己仿佛处于社交场合之中，比如拥挤的剧院。Douglass甚至录制了不同类型的笑声，还将男人，女人和孩子的笑声混合在一起。在这样做的过程中，他注意到笑声一个如今仍然让研究者十分感兴趣的特点：仅仅是简单的“哈哈”就能传达出数量惊人的社交信息。

第3段

In one study conducted in 2016, samples of laughter from pairs of English-speaking students were recorded at the University of California, Santa Cruz. A team made up of more than 30 psychological scientists, anthropologists, and biologists then played these recordings to listeners from 24 diverse societies, from indigenous tribes in New Guinea to city-dwellers in India and Europe. Participants were asked whether they thought the people laughing were friends or strangers. On average, the results were remarkably consistent: worldwide, people’s guesses were correct approximately 60% of the time.

在2016年进行的一项研究中，加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁兹分校几对母语为英语的学生的笑声样本被记录下来。由超过30名心理学家、人类学家和生物学家组成的团队随后将这些录音播放给来自24个不同社会的听众。它们既包括新几内亚的原住民部落，也包括印度和欧洲的城市居民。参与者被询问他们觉得正在大笑的人是朋友还是陌生人。平均来看，这些结果惊人地一致：世界范围内，人们的猜测在大约60%的时候都是正确的。

第4段

Researchers have also found that different types of laughter serve as codes to complex human social hierarchies. A team led by Christopher Oveis from the University of California, San Diego, found that high-status individuals had different laughs from low-status individuals, and that strangers’ judgements of an individual’s social status were influenced by the dominant or submissive quality of their laughter. In their study, 48 male college students were randomly assigned to groups of four, with each group composed of two low-status members, who had just joined their college fraternity group, and two high-status members, older students who had been active in the fraternity for at least two years. Laughter was recorded as each student took a turn at being teased by the others, involving the use of mildly insulting nicknames. Analysis revealed that, as expected, high-status individuals produced more dominant laughs and fewer submissive laughs relative to the low-status individuals. Meanwhile, low-status individuals were more likely to change their laughter based on their position of power; that is, the newcomers produced more dominant laughs when they were in the ‘powerful’ role of teasers. Dominant laughter was higher in pitch, louder, and more variable in tone than submissive laughter.

研究者们还发现：不同类型的笑声能够作为人类社会复杂层级的暗码使用。由加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校的Christopher Oveis领导的研究团队发现，社会地位高的个体与社会地位低的个体拥有不同的笑法，而陌生人对一个人社会地位的判断会受到他们笑声中支配性或服从性特质的影响。在他们的研究中，48名男性大学生被随机分为四人小组。每一组包含两名社会地位较低的成员（刚刚加入大学兄弟会）和两名社会地位较高的成员（至少已经在兄弟会中活跃两年的年长学生）。每位学生轮流被他人揶揄，具体手段包括使用有着轻微冒犯意味的外号，并记录他们的笑声。分析发现，正如事先预料的那样，与社会地位较低的个体相比，社会地位较高的人会发出更多支配性的笑声和更少服从性的笑声。与此同时，社会地位较低的个体更有可能根据他们的权力地位改变自己的笑声。也就是说，当新人处于揶揄者这一“掌权”地位时，他们会发出更多支配性的笑声。相比于服从性的笑声而言，支配性的笑声音调更高，声音更大，语调变化更为多样。

第5段

A random group of volunteers then listened to an equal number of dominant and submissive laughs from both the high- and low-status individuals, and were asked to estimate the social status of the laugher. In line with predictions, laughers producing dominant laughs were perceived to be significantly higher in status than laughers producing submissive laughs. ‘This was particularly true for low-status individuals, who were rated as significantly higher in status when displaying a dominant versus submissive laugh, ‘ Oveis and colleagues note. ‘Thus, by strategically displaying more dominant laughter when the context allows, low-status individuals may achieve higher status in the eyes of others.’ However, high-status individuals were rated as high-status whether they produced their natural dominant laugh or tried to do a submissive one.

随后，一组随机选取的志愿者会聆听来自高低社会地位个体的同等数量的支配性笑声和服从性笑声，并被要求评估发出笑声的人的社会地位。与预测一致，发出支配性笑声的人被认为社会地位远高于那些发出服从性笑声的人。“这对于社会地位较低的人来说尤其如此，与发出服从性笑声相比，他们在发出支配性笑声的时候，获得的社会地位评定明显更高”，Oveis和他的同事注意到。“因此，在环境允许的情况下，通过有策略地展示更多支配性的笑声，社会地位较低的个体文章来自老烤鸭雅思也许能够在别人眼中获得更高的地位”。然而，社会地位较高的个体无论是在发出自然的、支配性笑声时，还是在尝试发出服从性笑声时，都会被人们评定为高地位者。

第6段

Another study, conducted by David Cheng and Lu Wang of Australian National University, was based on the hypothesis that humour might provide a respite from tedious situations in the workplace. This ‘mental break’ might facilitate the replenishment of mental resources. To test this theory, the researchers recruited 74 business students, ostensibly for an experiment on perception. First, the students performed a tedious task in which they had to cross out every instance of the letter ‘e’ over two pages of text. The students then were randomly assigned to watch a video clip eliciting either humour, contentment, or neutral feelings. Some watched a clip of the BBC comedy Mr. Bean, others a relaxing scene with dolphins swimming in the ocean, and others a factual video about the management profession.

另一项由澳大利亚国立大学的David Cheng和Lu Wang所进行的研究则建立在这样的假设之上：幽默也许能让人从工作场所无聊乏味的环境中暂时解脱出来。这种“精神休息”也许能够帮助补充精力。为了测试这一理论，研究者以进行认知实验为名，招募了74名商学院的学生。首先，学生要完成一项无聊的任务。他们必须划掉长达两页的文本中所有的字母“e”。然后学生被随机安排观看一段视频，刺激或者幽默、或者满足、或者中立的情感。一些人观看BBC喜剧《憨豆先生》中的片段，另一些人观看海豚在海洋中畅游的轻松景象，还有一些人则观看有关管理学专业的一部纪实影片。

第7段

The students then completed a task requiring persistence in which they were asked to guess the potential performance of employees based on provided profiles, and were told that making 10 correct assessments in a row would lead to a win. However, the software was programmed such that it was nearly impossible to achieve 10 consecutive correct answers. Participants were allowed to quit the task at any point. Students who had watched the Mr. Bean video ended up spending significantly more time working on the task, making twice as many predictions as the other two groups.

这些学生随后完成一项需要毅力的任务。他们被要求根据所提供的资料猜测员工的潜在表现，并被告知连续进行10次正确的评估会赢得胜利。然而，软件的编程方式使其几乎不可能连续10次获得正确答案。参与者可以在任何时间退出任务。观看《憨豆先生》的学生最终在这项任务上投入的时间明显更多，所做预测是其他两组人的两倍。

第8段

Cheng and Wang then replicated these results in a second study, during which they had participants complete long multiplication questions by hand. Again, participants who watched the humorous video spent significantly more time working on this tedious task and completed more questions correctly than did the students in either of the other groups.

Cheng和Wang在第二项研究中重现了这些结果。他们要求参与者用手完成漫长的乘法计算。再一次的，与其他两组学生相比，观看幽默视频的参与者在这项枯燥的任务中投入的时间明显更多，回答对的问题也更多。

第9段

‘Although humour has been found to help relieve stress and facilitate social relationships, the traditional view of task performance implies that individuals should avoid things such as humour that may distract them from the accomplishment of task goals,’ Cheng and Wang conclude. ‘We suggest that humour is not only enjoyable but more importantly, energizing.’

“虽然早已发现幽默有助于缓解压力和促进社会关系，但有关任务表现的传统观点认为，个人应该避免诸如幽默这样会分散他们注意力、干扰完成任务目标的事情”，Cheng和Wang总结道，“我们认为幽默不仅让人愉悦，而且更重要的是，它还能给人增添精力”。

第27题答案：C

对应原文：第1段：Like other human emotions and expressions, laughter and humour provide psychological scientists with rich resources for studying human psychology

答案解析：A选项和B选项在原文中都找不到对应，D选项则错在前后不对应（笑是人类社会所共有的，在部分动物群体中可以发现，而非动物群体共有）。原文中提到，“正如其他人类情感与表达一样，笑和幽默为心理学家提供了研究人类心理的丰富资源”，即它对科学研究的价值，由此确定C为正确答案。

第28题答案：A

对应原文：第2段：These were intended to help people at home feel like they were in a social situation, such as a crowded theatre.

答案解析：B选项错在needed to be told when to laugh，属于无中生有。C选项错在audiences（原文中只提到他录制了各种人的笑声，并没有说适用于各个社会群体的观众）。D选项则错在preferred。原文中提到，他录制这些笑声“原本是为了帮助在家的人感觉仿佛置身于社交场合中一样，如拥挤的剧院”。即在群体环境中感受幽默的重要性，由此确定A为正确答案。

第29题答案：B

对应原文：第3段：On average, the results were remarkably consistent

答案解析：选项A和选项D在原文中都找不到对应。原文中虽然确实提到研究团队包括心理学家，人类学家和生物学家，但不符合题干particularly significant的要求。B选项similar对应consistent，a wide range of cultures对应前文中的24 diverse societies。最最重要的是，remarkably对应particularly significant，由此确定它为正确答案。

第30题答案：B

对应原文：第4段：each student took a turn at being teased by the others

答案解析：选项A，C和D在原文中均找不到对应。第4段中部提到，“学生轮流被他人嘲笑”，而且从后文中我们也可以看到他们还会嘲笑别人，即参与者会交换角色，由此确定B为正确答案。

第31题答案：D

对应原文：第5段：However, high-status individuals were rated as high-status whether they produced their natural dominant laugh or tried to do a submissive one.

答案解析：第5段最后提到，“社会地位较高的人无论发出支配性的笑声，还是尝试发出服从性的笑声，都会被评定为高地位者”，即他们总是能够被识别出来。由此确定D为正确答案。

第32题答案：F

对应原文：第6段：The students then were randomly assigned to watch a video clip eliciting either humour, contentment, or neutral feelings.

答案解析：根据Australian National University定位到第6段，再根据three videos定位到这句话。原文中的用词为human, contentment, or neutral feelings，只有选项F能够概括它们，由此确定它为正确答案。

第33题答案：H

对应原文：第7段：Students who had watched the Mr. Bean video ended up spending significantly more time working on the task

答案解析：原文中提到，看了《憨豆先生》的一组人在该任务上投入的时间更长。而《憨豆先生》则对应上文的幽默视频，amusing与humor同义替换，由此确定H为正确答案。G选项虽然意思上也勉强可以，但词性对不上。

第34题答案：C

对应原文：第8段：… in a second study, during which they had participants complete long multiplication questions by hand …  this tedious task

答案解析：根据second study定位到第8段。文段一开始只是说明具体的任务，并没有评价。但我们看到段末会发现，作者使用了tedious一词对该任务进行描述，C选项boring与它同义替换，由此确定答案。不过哪怕我们没有找到这个单词，从实验设计和文段含义也不难确定答案为boring。

第35题答案：D

对应原文：第9段：humour has been found to help relieve stress and facilitate social relationships

答案解析：根据social connections与social relationships的对应定位到第9段的这句话，reduce与relive同义替换，由此锁定stress。选项中与它比较接近的只有D选项anxiety。

第36题答案：E

对应原文：第9段：We suggest that humour is not only enjoyable but more importantly, energizing

答案解析：第9段最后一句话提到，幽默还能够为人们补充精力。E选项stimulating与energizing同义替换，由此锁定答案。

第37题答案：NOT GIVEN

对应原文：无

答案解析：原文中并没有对不同人群的准确率进行比较，题干属于无中生有，因此判断答案为NOT GIVEN.

第38题答案：YES

对应原文：第4段：Analysis revealed that, as expected

答案解析：根据San Diego study定位到第4段。原文中提到，“分析展示的结果与预料中的一样”，即他们的预测是正确的。由此判断答案为YES。

第39题答案：NO

对应原文：第7段：Students who had watched the Mr. Bean video ended up spending significantly more time working on the task

答案解析：第7段最后一句话指出，观看《憨豆先生》的学生在该任务上投入的时间明显更多。可见学生完成任务的时间并不是固定的。题干中fixed的描述与原文冲突，由此判断答案为NO。

第40题答案：NO

对应原文：第9段：the traditional view of task performance implies that individuals should avoid things such as humour that may distract them from the accomplishment of task goals,’ Cheng and Wang conclude. ‘We suggest that humour is not only enjoyable but more importantly, energizing.’

答案解析：传统观点认为，在完成任务过程中，人们应该避免幽默等会分散注意力的因素。但Cheng和Wang则认为幽默能够为人们补充精力，有助于任务的完成。两种观点相反。题干中in line with的描述与原文不符，由此判断答案为NO。