污染治理-雅思写作同意与否-雅思大作文范文companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment

这篇雅思写作大作文要求大家探讨个人和公司是否应该根据自己造成的污染按比例来清理环境。针对这种存在两个主体的题目，一般来说，分别进行论述会简单一些。即一段论述公司应不应该，另一段论述个人应不应该。小编搜集了一篇相关的高分范文，以供大家参考。

雅思写作大作文题目

Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

许多人认为公司和个人应该按照他们所产生的污染量按比例付款以清理环境。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意？

雅思写作大作文范文

It is often argued that people should be charged in accordance with the amount of pollution they produce.While I accept that certain organisations should be penalised for this,I believe that every individual should not be forced to pay a fine.

人们经常争论说，应该根据人们产生的污染量向他们收费。我同意某些组织应为此受到惩罚，但我认为不应强迫每个人都罚款。

There are several reasons why giant entrepreneurs should pay for contaminating the land.Being penalised with a specific amount of money,factories will help the government to raise fund which can be used in a variety of long-term and rationalised measures to mitigate the pollution on the earth.This will also deter them from producing more garbage and pollution.Take London as an example,where governments have invested recently a hefty amount of money in public transportation,in particular,local buses which have been designed to be much more efficient than the older ones.So these vehicles discharge fewer combustible pollutants into the air.Also,these self-centered companies sometimes exploit natural resources such as forests,water and agricultural lands,beyond all their limits just to increase the profit.If these companies are not obliged to share the amount of money,which is required to curb pollutions,they will become more short-sighted(or greedy)in terms of making more money without even caring about the impact on climate change and environment.

巨型企业家应为污染土地付出代价有以下几个原因。对工厂处以特定金额的罚款后，将有助于政府筹集资金，可用于各种长期合理的措施，以减轻对地球的污染。这也将阻止他们生产更多的垃圾和污染。以伦敦为例，最近政府在公共交通上投入了大量资金，使得当地公交车的设计效率要比旧公交车高得多。因此，这些车辆向空气中排放的可燃污染物更少。而且，这些以自我为中心的公司有时会为了增加利润，不顾限制，开采森林，水源和农业用地等自然资源。如果不强制这些公司出钱抑制污染，他们会变得更加短视或贪婪，为了赚取更多的金钱而不顾对气候变化和环境的影响。

However,I would argue that every individual should not be liable to pay the recommended fine.It is unrealistic that we can stop people from polluting the universe merely by imposing charges.Because people need electricity to enjoy technologies,farmland to grow crops,accommodation to live,food to eat and a mean of transportation to travel.Furthermore,if people from devastating backgrounds are charged more for the impact they have on climate,it will create an upheaval situation where lower-income groups would not be able to pay even for their daily necessities.

但是，我认为不应让每个人都承担罚款。仅靠施加罚款就阻止人们污染宇宙是不现实的。因为人们需要电力来享受技术，需要农田来种庄稼，需要房屋居住，需要食物吃饭，也需要交通工具出行。此外，如果来自贫困背景的人们因其对气候的影响而承担更多的责任，这将造成动荡的局面，低收入群体甚至无法支付其日常必需品。

In conclusion,only organisations who are earning millions of pounds by exploiting natural resources rather than all the common citizens should be obliged to share the amount of money in curbing pollution.

总而言之，通过开发自然资源而赚取数百万英镑的组织，而不是所有普通公民，应分担遏制污染的金钱。