雅思写作话题及范文:Write about the following topic:Some people think tha...

雅思写作话题及范文:Write about the following topic:Some people think tha...

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

您应该在这项任务上花费大约40分钟。

写下以下主题：

有些人认为所有的大学生都应该学习他们喜欢的任何东西。另一些人认为，他们应该只被允许学习将来有用的科目，例如与科学和技术有关的科目。

讨论这两种观点，并给出自己的观点。

给出你的答案的理由，并包括你自己的知识或经验中的任何相关例子。

至少写250个单词。

范文

The issue of study orientation of university students has aroused intense debates among the general public. Distinct interpretations regarding this subject have been noticed. Some persist that the freedom to select courses has the highest priority, while others contend that applied subjects associated with science and technology are the only one that college students should learn. Both sides of the issue have reasonable layers.

Those who hold the second statement have their sound reasons. A key point lies in the fact that allowing applied subjects only can offer necessary human capital for economic growth. Economic and social development, especially in those underdeveloped countries, has a huge demand for talents in science and technology. Therefore, university authorities should devote finite financial resources to those applied-oriented subjects as a priority.

Individuals who insist on the first statement also have a strong voice. Firstly, it can be observed easily that the freedom to choose or interest oriented study can motivate students' potentials to a fullest extent. Students' interest in a particular field undoubtedly leads to their passion to explore and investigate, which may bring about achievements in this area. Secondly, such freedom is more beneficial to students' all-round development. It is undeniable that art courses cultivate students' tastes; maths enhances logical thinking and analytical ability; accounting molds patience and meticulousness. Some may refute that these benefits are irrelevant to practical skills that the useful or applied subjects can bring to students. It is, however, no doubt that practical skills without logic, analytical ability and carefulness are detrimental to students' future career.

The discussion cited above demonstrates two viewpoints regarding study orientation of university students. The former focuses on the significance of applied subjects, while the latter concerns about the importance of freedom to choose courses. It is safe to conclude that to choose courses freely is more convincing.

大学生的学习取向问题在公众中引起了激烈的争论。人们注意到了关于这一主题的不同解释。一些人坚持认为，选择课程的自由是最重要的，而另一些人则认为，与科学和技术相关的应用学科是大学生应该学习的唯一学科。问题的双方都有合理的层次。

持第二种观点的人有其合理的理由。一个关键点在于，只允许应用学科为经济增长提供必要的人力资本。经济社会发展，特别是在那些不发达国家，对科技人才的需求巨大。因此，大学当局应优先为应用型学科投入有限的财政资源。

坚持第一句话的人也有很强的发言权。首先，可以很容易地看到，自由选择或以兴趣为导向的学习可以最大限度地激发学生的潜力。学生对某一特定领域的兴趣无疑会激发他们探索和研究的热情，从而在这一领域取得成就。其次，这种自由更有利于学生的全面发展。不可否认，艺术课程培养学生的品味；数学提高了逻辑思维和分析能力；会计塑造耐心和细心。有些人可能会反驳说，这些好处与有用或应用科目能够给学生带来的实际技能无关。然而，毫无疑问，缺乏逻辑、分析能力和细心的实践技能对学生未来的职业生涯有害。

上述讨论表明了关于大学生学习取向的两种观点。前者关注应用学科的重要性，而后者关注自由选择课程的重要性。可以肯定的是，自由选择课程更有说服力。