雅思写作话题及范文: Write about the following topic:In a number of count...

雅思写作话题及范文: Write about the following topic:In a number of count...

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

您应该在这项任务上花费大约40分钟。写下以下主题：

在许多国家，一些人认为有必要花费大量资金为城市间的高速列车修建新的铁路线。其他人认为，这笔钱应该用于改善现有的公共交通。

讨论这两种观点，并给出自己的观点。

给出你的答案的理由，并包括你自己的知识或经验中的任何相关例子。

至少写250个单词。

范文

The relative necessity of funding newly-established railway lines or public transport in service is a frequent topic of discussion when people try to evaluate how public money should be spent in terms of improving the urban transport system. To my mind, it is imperative for government to finance both, the result of which benefits the cities economically and culturally.There are good grounds for arguing that it is of great value to invest substantial money in railway line construction. One of these is largely based around the idea that building railway lines creates a huge market for the local business. This is particularly true for the distinct features of railways: delivering more goods and commuting with fast-pace, both of which allow for a more frequent and efficient commercial intercourse. A further point is that providing intercity railway lines contributes to an increase of richness and diversity in culture. This is because railways are available to transport people to remote areas, which facilitates mutual communication. Better understanding and less culture shock, therefore, can be the consequence of more communication. There are also, however, equally strong arguments for maintaining public transport in existence. One significant counter-argument is that, compared with allocating a large amount of money for railway lines establishment, it is a relatively more economical way to improve the overall transport system. The main philosophy behind this policy is that money saved could be funded in other fields that are in urgent need of investment. This, for example, can explain the fact that increasingly cities would spend more money in massive maintenance rather than in wide construction. Another related argument is that improving existing transport could prevent further environmental destruction and resources consumption. At its simplest, the remained resources are possible to support the cities to go further and more funds would be saved to solve the prospective environmental pollution.My own view is that there are merits for both ways to in guarantee a well-established transport system. A city should invest money in constructing new railway lines for the sake of boosting economy and enriching cultural diversity. Meanwhile, maintaining availability of the public transport should be advocated, attributing to the advantage of money saving and less environmental pollution.

当人们试图评估公共资金应如何用于改善城市交通系统时，为新建铁路或公共交通提供资金的相对必要性是一个经常讨论的话题。在我看来，政府必须为这两者提供资金，其结果是从经济和文化上造福于城市。有充分的理由认为，在铁路建设上投入大量资金是非常有价值的。其中之一主要基于这样一个想法，即修建铁路线为当地企业创造了一个巨大的市场。铁路的显着特点尤其如此：运输更多的货物，通勤速度更快，这两者都允许更频繁、更高效的商业往来。另一点是，提供城际铁路线有助于增加文化的丰富性和多样性。这是因为铁路可以将人们运送到偏远地区，这有利于相互沟通。因此，更好的理解和更少的文化冲击可能是更多交流的结果。然而，也有同样有力的理由支持维持现有的公共交通。一个重要的反驳是，与拨出大量资金修建铁路线相比，这是一种相对更经济的方式来改善整个运输系统。这项政策背后的主要理念是，节省下来的资金可以用于其他急需投资的领域。例如，这可以解释这样一个事实，即越来越多的城市将花费更多的钱进行大规模维护，而不是大规模建设。另一个相关论点是，改善现有运输可以防止进一步的环境破坏和资源消耗。最简单的说，剩余的资源可以支持城市进一步发展，并且可以节省更多的资金来解决潜在的环境污染。我个人的观点是，这两种方式都有好处，可以保证一个完善的运输系统。一个城市应该投资建设新的铁路线，以促进经济发展和丰富文化多样性。同时，由于节省资金和减少环境污染的优势，应提倡保持公共交通的可用性。